Haiti
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
62
Grants
1
Denials
61
Grant rate: 1.6%Denial rate: 98.4%
Immigration judge
Clerical Transfer Code
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
25.1%
50 / 199
Total decisions
199
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
25.1%
Grants: 50
Denial rate
74.9%
Denials: 149
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants50 / 199
Denials149 / 199
Other relief0 / 199
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Clerical Transfer Code.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Haiti Sufficient sample | 62 | 1 | 61 | 1.6% | 98.4% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 26 | 25 | 1 | 96.2% | 3.8% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 24 | 2 | 22 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 16 | 2 | 14 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Indonesia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Liechtenstein Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Poland Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Burundi Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
25
Denials
1
Grant rate: 96.2%Denial rate: 3.8%
Spain
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
2
Denials
22
Grant rate: 8.3%Denial rate: 91.7%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
2
Denials
14
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
Cuba
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
2
Denials
13
Grant rate: 13.3%Denial rate: 86.7%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Grant rate: 55.6%Denial rate: 44.4%
Iran
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Mexico
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Former Countries
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Indonesia
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Pakistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Liechtenstein
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Poland
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Vietnam
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Bulgaria
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Burundi
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Eritrea
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Ethiopia
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Former Countries
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Scott G Alexander
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 18.5%
- Denial Rate
- 81.5%
Michelle Araneta
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 13.0%
- Denial Rate
- 87.0%
Thomas Ayze
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 9.0%
- Denial Rate
- 91.0%
John Barnes
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 10.3%
- Denial Rate
- 89.7%
Kevin G. Bradley
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 15.3%
- Denial Rate
- 84.7%
Suzan C. Brauwerman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 14.9%
- Denial Rate
- 85.1%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.